Sharp Aquos Mini SH-M03 vs Vivo Xplay 5A
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos Mini SH-M03 and Vivo Xplay 5A. Find out which smartphone has better performance.
Performance (Benchmarks)
| 990 | 3DMark for Android Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1 / Metal) | 821 |
| 1273 | 3DMark for Android Sling Shot | 1334 |
| 3083 | PCMark for Android Work 2.0 | 5477 |
Specs
| Sharp Aquos Mini SH-M03 | Model name | Vivo Xplay 5A |
| Android 6.0 | Operating system (OS) | Android 5.1 |
| Bluetooth WLAN | Network Connectivity | Bluetooth WLAN |
| Yes, microUSB 2.0 | Interfaces / connectors | Yes, Type-C |
Display
| 1920 × 1080 px | Resolution | 2560 × 1440 px |
| IGZO LCD | Technology | Super AMOLED |
| Yes | Multi‑Touch | Yes |
| 4.7" | Screen size | 5.4" |
Processor (CPU)
| Up to 1.82 GHz dual-core ARM Cortex-A57 and 1.44 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 | CPU Architecture | Up to 1.8 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A72 and 1.4 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 |
| Snapdragon 808 (MSM8992) | CPU | Snapdragon 652 (MSM8976) |
| Adreno 418 | GPU | Adreno 510 |
Storage
| 3072 MB | RAM (Memory) | 4096 MB |
| 16 GB | Storage (ROM) | 128 GB |
Camera
| Yes, 13 MP | Rear Camera(s) | Yes, 16 MP |
| Yes, 5 MP | Selfie Camera(s) | Yes, 8 MP |
Networks
| GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | 2G | varies by model |
| HSDPA 800 / 850 / 2100 | 3G | varies by model |
| LTE 800 / 1700 / 2100 | 4G (LTE) | varies by model |
Location
| Yes | GPS | Yes |
| Yes | A-GPS | Yes |
Battery
| 2810 mAh | Battery capacity | 3600 mAh |
Design
| 66 / 126 / 8.9 mm | Dimensions | 76.2 / 153.5 / 7.6 mm |
| 120 g | Weight | 167.8 g |