Realme X50 Pro Player vs Sharp Aquos Zeta SH-03G
Was ist der Unterschied zwischen Realme X50 Pro Player und Sharp Aquos Zeta SH-03G. Finden Sie heraus, welches Smartphone die bessere Performance hat.
Performance (Benchmarks)
| 13428 | PCMark for Android Work 2.0 | 3226 |
| 11481 | PCMark for Android Computer vision | 981 |
| 27581 | PCMark for Android Storage | 3134 |
Technische daten / Spezifikationen
| Realme X50 Pro Player | Produktname | Sharp Aquos Zeta SH-03G |
| Android 10 | Betriebssystem (OS) | Android 5.0 |
| Bluetooth WLAN NFC | Drahtlose Technologien | Bluetooth WLAN NFC |
| Yes, Type-C | Interface | Yes, microUSB 2.0 |
Display
| 2400 × 1080 px | Display Auflösung | 1920 × 1080 px |
| Super AMOLED | Displaytechnologie | IGZO LCD |
| Yes | Multi‑Touch | Yes |
| 6.44" | Bildschirm-Diagonale | 5.5" |
Prozessor (CPU)
| Up to 2.84 GHz single-core Kryo 585, 2.42 GHz tri-core Kryo 585 & 1.8 GHz quad-core Kryo 585 | CPU-Architektur | Up to 2.0 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A57 and 1.5 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 |
| Snapdragon 865 | Prozessor | Snapdragon 810 (MSM8994) |
| Adreno 650 | Grafikprozessor GPU | Adreno 430 |
Kapazität
| 6144 / 8192 / 12288 MB | RAM Speicher | 3072 MB |
| 128 / 256 / 512 GB | Interner Speicher (ROM) | 32 GB |
| No | Speicher-Erweiterung Details | microSD |
Kamera
| Yes, 48 MP | Hauptkamera | Yes, 13.1 MP |
| Yes, 16 MP | Front-Kamera (Selfie) | Yes, 2.1 MP |
Konnektivität
| varies by model | 2G | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| varies by model | 3G | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 2100 |
| varies by model | 4G (LTE) | LTE 700 / 800 / 1500 / 1800 / 2100 |
Navigation
| Yes | GPS | Yes |
| Yes | A-GPS | Yes |
Akku
| 4200 mAh | Akku-Kapazität | 3000 mAh |
Gehäuse
| 74.2 / 159 / 8.9 mm | Maße | 76 / 141 / 8.3 mm |
| 209 g | Gewicht | 150 g |